|
|
Post by g1nz0 on Dec 29, 2013 8:13:48 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Dark Crimson Fox on Dec 30, 2013 9:47:51 GMT -6
So I assume this is very similar to Dragon rules ? Do this deck consist of many different elements of play
|
|
|
|
Post by g1nz0 on Dec 30, 2013 17:30:50 GMT -6
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean, or are asking here....
|
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Dec 31, 2013 13:09:22 GMT -6
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean, or are asking here.... He's asking if this plays like Dragon Rulers. How has this deck worked for you? |
|
|
|
Post by g1nz0 on Dec 31, 2013 23:42:21 GMT -6
It does not play like Dragon Ruler, aside from the Dragon Ruler plays that the deck has due to it including the 4 Dragon Rulers.
The deck has worked. It draws infinitely worse than Dragon Rulers and contains lots of cards that require other cards to become live....But....when it draws strong it will outpace every deck that will see play in the start of the format. I have already said in this thread that I am no longer playing this, but while we were testing with the different variations of the Dragon based decks I had turns where I could develop 18 cards beyond my opening 6 card hand, ending with at least a Felgrand on board, and no deck was able to hang with that. The more awkward hands is where the deck can struggle/lose. Outside of Felgrand, this deck has a very budget feel so that will give you an idea of how it will place versus everything else that has buzz and momentum currently heading into this format.
|
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Jan 1, 2014 11:39:42 GMT -6
It does not play like Dragon Ruler, aside from the Dragon Ruler plays that the deck has due to it including the 4 Dragon Rulers. The deck has worked. It draws infinitely worse than Dragon Rulers and contains lots of cards that require other cards to become live....But....when it draws strong it will outpace every deck that will see play in the start of the format. I have already said in this thread that I am no longer playing this, but while we were testing with the different variations of the Dragon based decks I had turns where I could develop 18 cards beyond my opening 6 card hand, ending with at least a Felgrand on board, and no deck was able to hang with that. The more awkward hands is where the deck can struggle/lose. Outside of Felgrand, this deck has a very budget feel so that will give you an idea of how it will place versus everything else that has buzz and momentum currently heading into this format. Okay, I don't know where you think you are, but you might want to check what thread this is. You have NOT said anywhere that you are no longer using this deck. You are NOT running felgrand, nor do you have an easy way to make him. Could you maybe offer a response that has some basis to the actual thread? |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Jan 1, 2014 11:47:36 GMT -6
This looks like it will play heavily like a Crane Plants build but have the added benefit of Dragon Ruler plays in the Xyz and Synchros. Other than that its mostly just an updated version of Plant Rulers from the early Sept.13 format with Dragon Shrines replacing the lost Ravines.
|
|
|
|
Post by g1nz0 on Jan 1, 2014 22:45:40 GMT -6
Okay, I don't know where you think you are, but you might want to check what thread this is. You have NOT said anywhere that you are no longer using this deck. You are NOT running felgrand, nor do you have an easy way to make him. Could you maybe offer a response that has some basis to the actual thread? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA at your post and the fact that I knew that me naming both of my Dragon threads with the 2K14 would wind up fucking me up, lolol. But I did say those things in my other Dragon thread. And the thought can be placed on this deck as well. So, there is that. |
|
