|
|
Post by Shadwen on Nov 1, 2013 10:04:05 GMT -6
Main: 40
Monsters: 15
3 Des Lacooda
3 Golem Sentry
2 Lava Golem
1 Stealth Bird
1 Swarm of Locusts
3 Swarm of Scarabs
2 Vortex Trooper
Spells: 10
1 Book of Moon
1 Dark Hole
3 Ghostrick House
3 Pot of Duality
2 Swords of Revealing Light
Traps: 15
1 Compulsory Evacuation Device
2 Dark Bribe
2 Fiendish Chain
2 Mirror Force
1 Needle Ceiling
2 The Huge Revolution is Over
3 Threatening Roar
Side:
Coming Soon
Extra:
1 Chronomaly Crystal Chrononaut
3 Ghostrick Alucard
1 Grenosaurus
2 Leviair the Sea Dragon
1 Mechquipped Angineer
2 Number 17: Leviathan Dragon
1 Number 30: Acid Golem of Destruction
1 Number 49: Fortune Tune
1 Temtempo the Percussion Djinn
2 Wind-Up Zenmaines
Explanation:
The Deck is a 1for1 deck. It allows me to mitigate the speed of the game while sitting safe. Removing Options, clearing board, and hitting the opponent for minimal damage every turn.
The XYZ's allow for more control or bigger pushes when needed.
Record:
2-0-0
Dragunities
Madolches
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2013 13:11:24 GMT -6
looks solid , nice win record so far.Ghost trick house is interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadwen on Nov 1, 2013 14:59:38 GMT -6
Heh thanks!
Yeah, Ghostrick is just an extra safety card for my monsters. However...it does allow big direct pushes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 3, 2013 0:28:26 GMT -6
not to bash your deck, as I quite like it, but wouldn't a frog engine (2-3 swap frog, 3 dupe,1-2 ronintoadin, 2-3 swap and 2 des croaking) work better as a defensive backing and grand you more means to operate a solid defensive effort whilst gaining advantage (frog wall, croaking, moray of greed, ageis of the ocean dragonlord, surface creating walls or R2's from no where, ease of summon for swarm of crows, moulin glacia, and last but not least, compatibility with tidal AND redox-by way of lacooda, medusa worm in place of scrabs and golem.)
I've just never got why frog-man never caught on I guess...
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadwen on Nov 3, 2013 8:46:23 GMT -6
I might give frogman a try.
|
|
|
|
Post by BurnForGame on Nov 4, 2013 22:13:03 GMT -6
In the meantime, I'll let you in on my favorite secret tech with Ghostrick Mansion. I do it because I trust you will use it well in a deck like this...
...Spirit Barrier. As long as you control a monster, you take no Battle Damage. This means that if you have Mansion and Barrier up, your monsters can't be attacked and you'll be immune to direct attacks. I wouldn't run PACMAN any other way right now, as it helps to reduce the reliance on Traps. Sure, Mansion means you'll have to resolve that many more effects to win, but protecting the Barrier combo means you'll only have to worry about your monsters' effects being negated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadwen on Nov 5, 2013 0:25:50 GMT -6
I have been using barrier and mansion for a while. popped into my my head immediately.
I might need to revise the deck for total protection rather than constant control. Just minimize options through locking out aspects of the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by BurnForGame on Nov 5, 2013 8:24:42 GMT -6
I've even considered trying to sneak Vanity's Fiend into a build somehow, but Emptiness is easier to use for now. MY real concern here is with Vortex Trooper. I love the card, but I think it's better in faster decks, or ones that can keep you from taking full ATK to the face more often.
Also, I would run double Angineer or #49 (love that card here) instead of double Leviair. I would absolutely side that Leviair (or drop Temtempo instead, if you want double Leviair that badly) for matchups that would have something to do with stolen opposing monsters, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 6, 2013 13:05:29 GMT -6
Double #49 just sounds absolutely frustrating on field.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 6, 2013 14:11:22 GMT -6
Double #49 just sounds absolutely frustrating on field. it is, I've dropped them in tandem in a test deck running frogs. |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 6, 2013 14:23:11 GMT -6
I may have to pick up another to try in my Experiment......
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 6, 2013 20:55:53 GMT -6
I may have to pick up another to try in my Experiment...... care to elaborate? |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 7, 2013 9:36:54 GMT -6
You've seen the Experiment over on Ninja, But I was talking about using double #49 in that since I usually have a constant stream of 3s to make it.
|
|
