Snowmelt

[BurnForGame]

That wouldn't do me any favors. I don't want to play the Field War in order to get Falcon to go off, either. I cold go back to an earlier post and just edit it, too:

"Besides, Mountain is a Field. Hunting Ground already fills that role. If I am to remove Solidarity, it can only be with another Continuous card (preferably a Spell) that will always boost Falcon, because that's what it achieves in this deck. It's another face-up card for Zerofyne, and I know that whenever I have Solidarity plus a monster in the grave, its effect will be active for Falcon as well. I need something with that total reliability, otherwise Solidarity will have to stay."

I think we should move on from the whole "how to take Solidarity out" part of the discussion. I think it's been proven by now that it's worth the Type focus in this case, or at least that it's not worth removing.

[Ursiel]

But what if I like poking at you? And it was a viable option, you just don't like it.

[BurnForGame]

Poking at me? I'm missing that part. Completely.

I wouldn't really call Mountain viable, though. It does not fulfill the role here of the card I'm already using. It's more that I've been calling for a better option of one can be found, and that simply has not happened. This deck is the exception to the rule in that sense. I'm not complaining about that fact, but again. I don't use Solidarity here the way I have in other decks. You've played against this. You should know!

[Ursiel]

Poking at you to get you to remove Solidarity. Still hate that card's restrictions.