|
Post by bystander on Oct 18, 2014 7:29:01 GMT -6
Super Polymerization forbidden? No way! However, I do agree that Stratos should be limited. That way, it can start it's comeback. Speed 4 advantage generating generic fusion card. Yeah, no. Card needs to go. Yeah its fine @ 1. There are only 2 decks that will make any real use out of this card, Doll and HEROs. HEROs won't become part of the Meta again until after the structure drops in late January. Dolls will have picked up there own Fusion QP in NECH by then. With the new Trap monster that can change its attribute also in NECH it pretty much seals what plays Dolls will be using post NECH.
|
|
|
Post by elvisbeck on Oct 18, 2014 7:36:58 GMT -6
I'm running a HEROS deck right now, and I plan on building a Doll deck. I'm cool with it at 1, but forbidden? That's not cool to me.
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Oct 18, 2014 7:55:11 GMT -6
I'm running a HEROS deck right now, and I plan on building a Doll deck. I'm cool with it at 1, but forbidden? That's not cool to me. That opinion isn't exactly objective. I have a doll deck, and I've piloted it with 3 Super Polymerization, and 1 Super Polymerization. My assessment is that the card is too overpowered and needs to go. Since you lot seem adamant on it being at 1, let's just agree to disagree.
|
|
|
Post by elvisbeck on Oct 18, 2014 11:04:37 GMT -6
Ok. I can agree to disagree on that.
|
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 73
|
Post by soup on Oct 18, 2014 15:28:12 GMT -6
I just tried to think of a card on par with super poly. Nearly unstoppable removal of an opponent monster + SS a boss monster, all in one card.. Couldn't really think of anything, so I guess I feel it's fair to ban.
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Oct 19, 2014 8:52:34 GMT -6
The boss monster can still dealt during the summon window. It still allows for the use of Warning/BTH/CED against the monster instead of chaining it to Super Poly.
|
|
soup
New Member
Posts: 73
|
Post by soup on Oct 19, 2014 9:28:01 GMT -6
Yeah, I know. I just meant the removal of an Opponents monster is nearly unstoppable. example: it's not a destruction effect so opponents monsters are less protected(think beelze).
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Oct 19, 2014 10:38:14 GMT -6
Well Yeah does have that spell speed 4 clause.
I just find rather easier than bitching about how broken this card is, I just deal with the end result.
|
|
|
Post by troza on Oct 20, 2014 2:00:35 GMT -6
The boss monster can still dealt during the summon window. It still allows for the use of Warning/BTH/CED against the monster instead of chaining it to Super Poly. You can use Solemn Warning that way? Are you sure about that? I mean, isn't super poly the spell that special summons?
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Oct 20, 2014 7:40:13 GMT -6
Yes you can. You have the option of chaining it to any effect that can special summon a monster OR you can just wait to the monster is summoned and activate it then.
Since Super Poly clearly states nothing can be chained to its activation, you have to wait till the monster is summoned to flip Warning.
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Oct 20, 2014 9:37:37 GMT -6
No. You cannot use Warning on the summon of the fusion monster. Warning would be too late since the resolution of Super Poly (or any fusion card) means the summon was successful and past the point of negating it. CED, BTH, etc would still be good though.
|
|
|
Post by troza on Oct 20, 2014 9:52:00 GMT -6
No. You cannot use Warning on the summon of the fusion monster. Warning would be too late since the resolution of Super Poly (or any fusion card) means the summon was successful and past the point of negating it. CED, BTH, etc would still be good though. Just wanted some confirmation. Super Poly is a card effect that would special summon... meaning that the special summon occurs at the resolution of that card effect... you didn't negate? Bad luck
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Oct 20, 2014 13:56:06 GMT -6
No. You cannot use Warning on the summon of the fusion monster. Warning would be too late since the resolution of Super Poly (or any fusion card) means the summon was successful and past the point of negating it. CED, BTH, etc would still be good though. HMM that is interesting. No one ever stooped me or questioned this on DN.
|
|
|
Post by troza on Oct 21, 2014 1:54:53 GMT -6
Really? who are you playing against on DN?
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Oct 21, 2014 8:25:20 GMT -6
Apparently players who don't know this.
|
|