|
Post by ragda on Sept 13, 2014 18:23:46 GMT -6
Aaaand Mike is back! I find it somewhat fitting Burning Abyss would get this guy out again.
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Sept 14, 2014 10:23:46 GMT -6
Aaaand Mike is back! I find it somewhat fitting Burning Abyss would get this guy out again. It is rather fitting. I have a regional next Saturday in LA, and decided to go with this deck over dolls. Side is basically set, it's performed flawlessly in testing, I just feel paranoid about Super Poly. If it weren't for that, the doll match-up would be a cakewalk.
|
|
|
Post by ragda on Sept 14, 2014 23:37:25 GMT -6
At least you got NFA for that. I assume it's also kinda like an Emptiness filler?
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Sept 15, 2014 11:46:43 GMT -6
At least you got NFA for that. I assume it's also kinda like an Emptiness filler? Basically. I am not using Emptiness for a few of reasons. 1) Someone else has had my 2 copies for over a year. 2) I don't like that it's an inherent -2. 3) It's an awful mid-late game top deck.
|
|
|
Post by ragda on Sept 15, 2014 13:01:15 GMT -6
Yes it will eventually off itself later, negging you more but during its initial use it's a +1, so it generally evens out in the end.
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Sept 17, 2014 12:40:12 GMT -6
Regardless of whether or not I use Exodius, I think I'm dropping a Raiza for a third MST in the main. Backrow really hurts.
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Sept 21, 2014 19:03:03 GMT -6
Went 7-3 at the LA Regional (Lost to a scrub that thought they could get Felis from a Foolish Burial play because I bricked game 1, and game 3 they opened with 2 Chain Disappearance and a Shadow-Imprisoning Mirror; Lost to Stellar on turns (had we not gone into time, I would have won since he was out of monsters);and lost to Burning Abyss mirror (they opened the nuts, and I didn't open with tour guide once either of those games). The guy that beat me round 1 dropped, and the stellarknight guy went to x-2 after being crushed by Starstrikeduelistx, so I ended up with a final standing of 113 (needless to say, I was really pissed off).
So, I changed the build a little. Hopefully with this, I can qualify at the OTS next weekend.
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Sept 26, 2014 18:39:26 GMT -6
Did your regional have any specific ruling with Chain Disappearance?
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Sept 27, 2014 6:37:21 GMT -6
Did your regional have any specific ruling with Chain Disappearance? How it was ruled: If it hits Dante, all of them in extra are removed.
|
|
|
Post by ragda on Sept 27, 2014 23:08:42 GMT -6
How about the whole face-down monster + BA monsters?
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Sept 29, 2014 9:43:55 GMT -6
Did your regional have any specific ruling with Chain Disappearance? How it was ruled: If it hits Dante, all of them in extra are removed. Yup that would be it. That is so fucking stupid imo. And yes, any face down monster counts as a non-Burning Abyss monster so face up Malebranche will commit suicide.
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Sept 29, 2014 11:33:30 GMT -6
Updated the deck for the new list, pre-nech format.
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Oct 29, 2014 9:19:45 GMT -6
Updated the deck for post NECH. Main and side still pending.
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Oct 29, 2014 19:00:44 GMT -6
Any testing with the new ones yet?
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Oct 31, 2014 11:19:01 GMT -6
Any testing with the new ones yet? Yes. Right now I am using 1 Rubic (2 Virgil in extra), 1 Alich and 1 Calcab. I really, really like Calcab with Phoenix Wing. I honestly don't see the point in using Fire Lake in the main. Yeah, it's a hypothetical +2, but it's easily broadcasted/disrupted and it's not always the optimal play to make.
|
|