|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 28, 2014 10:36:30 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by ragda on Apr 28, 2014 12:28:28 GMT -6
HYYYYPE! Even if the effect is a bit *ahem* "lackluster" in some aspects, it's really cool to see this TCG-side.
|
|
|
|
Post by Meat~Product on Apr 28, 2014 12:45:17 GMT -6
Not bad, not bad at all. Hope to see his Knights follow him as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Apr 28, 2014 13:16:55 GMT -6
He's pretty. That's all I can say about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 28, 2014 13:32:17 GMT -6
Not bad, not bad at all. Hope to see his Knights follow him as well. The knights should hopefully be put into a booster set as OCG imports. |
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Apr 28, 2014 14:07:23 GMT -6
...Time to rebuild my Ragnarok deck.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Apr 28, 2014 14:42:01 GMT -6
without the nights he's not so great, when we get the nights and exchange that'll be good.
|
|
|
|
Post by troza on Apr 28, 2014 15:01:27 GMT -6
I would love to get it just for collection. I don't like him that much
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Apr 28, 2014 17:27:35 GMT -6
Like I said, he's pretty. That's probably the only reason I would keep him, unless he's actually worth a damn to sell. Archfiend Commander was disappointing.
|
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 28, 2014 18:13:15 GMT -6
Like I said, he's pretty. That's probably the only reason I would keep him, unless he's actually worth a damn to sell. Archfiend Commander was disappointing. It s the next card in the Jump line for my Jump collection, so yeah he is a keeper. |
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Apr 28, 2014 18:57:40 GMT -6
without the nights he's not so great, when we get the nights and exchange that'll be good. Obviously you haven't seen how I used him. The knights are cloggy and cost too much to use without losing major advantage. |
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 28, 2014 19:07:27 GMT -6
without the nights he's not so great, when we get the nights and exchange that'll be good. Obviously you haven't seen how I used him. The knights are cloggy and cost too much to use without losing major advantage. You are talking about that deck then. |
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Apr 28, 2014 19:12:04 GMT -6
Obviously you haven't seen how I used him. The knights are cloggy and cost too much to use without losing major advantage. You are talking about that deck then. The deck I sent to you with the chaos knights & foolish chaos knights? No. I'm talking about a Nordic deck I made dubbed Ragnarok: Twlight of the Gods. Nordics control the L/D balance surprisingly well. |
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 28, 2014 19:19:39 GMT -6
Yeah the chaos knights is what saw.
Nordics, that isn't seen everyday. Kinda interested in seeing what that deck can do.
|
|
|
|
Post by ragda on Apr 28, 2014 21:01:44 GMT -6
Like I said, he's pretty. That's probably the only reason I would keep him, unless he's actually worth a damn to sell. Archfiend Commander was disappointing. HEY! Commander is cool!  Took me a while to get 3 from 0. |
|
.png)
