|
|
Post by JerkJerk on Nov 1, 2013 16:52:01 GMT -6
Forbidden
Return from the Different Dimension
Dark Hole
Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning
Limited
Blaster, Dragon Ruler of Infernos
Tempest, Dragon Ruler of Storms
Tidal, Dragon Ruler of Waterfalls
Redox, Dragon Ruler of Boulders
Sacred Sword of Seven Stars
Maiden with Eyes of Blue
Pot of Avarice
World of Prophecy
Fire Formation - Tenki
Semi-Limited
Book of Moon
Reactan, Dragon Ruler of Pebbles
Lightning, Dragon Ruler of Drafts
Burner, Dragon Ruler of Sparks
Stream, Dragon Ruler of Droplets
Soul Drain
Spellbook of Secrets
Spellbook Magician of Prophecy
Dandylion
Monster Gate
Unlimited
Magical Stone Excavation
Reasoning
T.G. Striker
Archlord Kristya
Advanced Ritual Art
|
|
|
|
Post by necromancer15 on Nov 1, 2013 16:54:37 GMT -6
Sixth Sense?
Maiden isn't really good, and nobody runs more than 1 world generally anyway because drawing it sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Nov 1, 2013 17:02:19 GMT -6
Too many hits. Spellbooks aren't relevant at the moment, by the way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 3, 2013 0:19:57 GMT -6
Limit big dragons, F$ck the little ones (they can stay where they are or go back to 3 for all I care) m Maiden? Are you still sore about her?  She's the first bit of decent support for that archetype in YEARS. go get some preparation H for that butt-hurt and deal with spellbooks instead if you're so worried about BEWD abuse coming from her. (in all seriousness, it's a pointless hit, so why do it, please explain.) unlimiting krystia and ARA is just asking to give perfect herald a perfect orgasam all-over the next 4 months......way too good for that deck, IMO they get 3 of one or the other and 1 of the opposite, or 2 of each but not 3-3. |
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Nov 3, 2013 15:51:11 GMT -6
The Blue-Eyes variant of spellbooks isn't even that good. Just saying...
|
|
|
|
Post by JerkJerk on Nov 3, 2013 23:43:02 GMT -6
The Blue-Eyes variant of spellbooks isn't even that good. Just saying... It's my prediction, not what I think. Trying to channel my inner Konami fuckery. |
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 4, 2013 2:39:38 GMT -6
The Blue-Eyes variant of spellbooks isn't even that good. Just saying... It's my prediction, not what I think. Trying to channel my inner Konami fuckery. all I see is the bold =_= .It does seem like something they would do randomly, but I just doubt it, since the trend is let the structures cards stay online (fish people get hated on cause they fucked mermaids to become a giant gyre of murderous,merlantian-mother fuckers) |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 4, 2013 15:22:04 GMT -6
But you have to remember that Dragoons got hit and its a structure card. Maiden could be taken the same way, as a preemptive hit against what Konami believes will rise in power/popularity.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 4, 2013 15:42:50 GMT -6
maiden seldom gets bewd on her own (via the battle effect) usually people trigger her with a 3rd card (book of moon, compulse, veiler ect) to get blue eyes. Unlike dragoons and the babies who triggers with ease in their own deck, maiden is a far more passive card.
|
|
|
|
Post by JerkJerk on Nov 4, 2013 16:18:48 GMT -6
It's my prediction, not what I think. Trying to channel my inner Konami fuckery. all I see is the bold =_= .It does seem like something they would do randomly, but I just doubt it, since the trend is let the structures cards stay online (fish people get hated on cause they fucked mermaids to become a giant gyre of murderous,merlantian-mother fuckers) As said, Dragoons was limited. Foolish Burial was a structure deck card, etc. Seems like a bad argument. |
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 4, 2013 18:14:36 GMT -6
all I see is the bold =_= .It does seem like something they would do randomly, but I just doubt it, since the trend is let the structures cards stay online (fish people get hated on cause they fucked mermaids to become a giant gyre of murderous,merlantian-mother fuckers) As said, Dragoons was limited. Foolish Burial was a structure deck card, etc. Seems like a bad argument. it wasn't meant to be an argument, more my opinion than anything else, with a dash of sarcasm. I don't have a solid argument for maiden beyond pointing out have every deck using it has it as a supplementary nature, rather than a primary function. dragoons was what you went for in mermail-atlantian, and it makes sense why. it's a card that grants aggression for aggression. |
|
|
|
Post by troza on Nov 5, 2013 4:44:06 GMT -6
Why did you choose BLS-EotB there? I mean... the card is good and, with the new lightsworn cards and noble Knights, might be too good in some decks but I don't see that happening.
Limit the dragons... why limit and not semi-limit to try to finish the Dragons as a deck but give them to be the supporters on others? I'm asking not cause I don't agree but I'm curious to read the answer.
I don't agree with pot of avarice... with the new secret out there, why would they give us this card back?
And Maiden of the Eyes of Blue... I know that she isn't that sexy, but I guess that she isn't that ugly for us to not want that around.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 5, 2013 14:50:39 GMT -6
What Maiden does bring to the table though is a change in tempo. Unless the opponent has one of the few answers to here that are commonly played she slows the game down until she can be dealt with. She also eats multiple resources if the opponent can't handle her properly. She may not create backbreaking combos like Dragoons did, but she does alter how the game is played when she hits field.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 5, 2013 17:09:01 GMT -6
What Maiden does bring to the table though is a change in tempo. Unless the opponent has one of the few answers to here that are commonly played she slows the game down until she can be dealt with. She also eats multiple resources if the opponent can't handle her properly. She may not create backbreaking combos like Dragoons did, but she does alter how the game is played when she hits field. she grants a second dimension to a otherwise linear deck with minimal viable plays. that can't be a bad thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 5, 2013 17:12:31 GMT -6
Not saying its a bad thing, I'm saying that its something that could warrant a hit on her. Maybe not this next format unless other hits see that deck able to become a dominating force.
|
|
She's the first bit of decent support for that archetype in YEARS. go get some preparation H for that butt-hurt and deal with spellbooks instead if you're so worried about BEWD abuse coming from her. 
.png)
