|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Feb 14, 2014 8:39:39 GMT -6
Damn Ape, I forgot how nice it was to have your deck building mind around!
I love the theory here, I'm worried however that with RML, Monk, Lonefire and Miracle Fertilizer, (they all either use or block your normally summon) there would be some clogging.
Gift of Greed is a card I kind of want to run, I just feel it goes back and forth on how useful it would be because while it makes slump live, it doesn't ALSO do something for you (Like ODOP or Level Modulation)
I don't suppose you got a chance to test this at all?
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Feb 15, 2014 1:07:36 GMT -6
Damn Ape, I forgot how nice it was to have your deck building mind around! I love the theory here, I'm worried however that with RML, Monk, Lonefire and Miracle Fertilizer, (they all either use or block your normally summon) there would be some clogging. Gift of Greed is a card I kind of want to run, I just feel it goes back and forth on how useful it would be because while it makes slump live, it doesn't ALSO do something for you (Like ODOP or Level Modulation) I don't suppose you got a chance to test this at all? lol you B#tches would miss me if I ever truly left the game. You'd have to look at all the bad cards your selves lol  I do see that, but my best suggestion would just be to add double summons or keep in mind monk and COTH can bypass those cards that bypass/block your normals. your entire theory and main plans run on NOT normaling into kristia or horus, so worrying about getting stuck without a summon is kind of a moot point. Gift just makes sense more than upstart(deck filler) or that dragon searchy OCG thing I honestly barely even glanced at. (it's just not clicking for me in this idea...).I'd rather run like jetroid or bubble illusion or go Traddy with this deck and use maryuka the destructor to play traps out of hand over running "empty" deckspace cards like upstart. I have not, I've got my own decks to test! ive been without DN for two months, can you even fathom how SHACK WACKY I got without instant deck testing on DN??? I like a few dozen decks to test before I even look at this format's meta, let alone speculate on the summer format's upcoming meta and fun decks... You're welcome to try my build though! My brain is open for picking with regards to decks like this any time. I've seen a lot and tried almost as much, so I am good with thinking of those little "how did I forget that"'s like greed.  |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Feb 16, 2014 11:25:20 GMT -6
lol who you calling bitches?
|
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Feb 16, 2014 15:18:20 GMT -6
Haven't really had a chance to run this recently, been testing newer cards.
Back burner for now as I'm cooking up a rather nasty koa'ki meiru build.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Feb 16, 2014 20:14:31 GMT -6
lol who you calling bitches? I meant it in the nicest way possible mr.mom.... |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Feb 17, 2014 9:05:10 GMT -6
Hey just because I raise my children for a living does not mean I am "mr.mom". That is sexist, and I thought you were better than that.  |
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Feb 17, 2014 9:13:26 GMT -6
I'm just going to sit here and laugh.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Feb 17, 2014 10:37:46 GMT -6
Hey just because I raise my children for a living does not mean I am "mr.mom". That is sexist, and I thought you were better than that. fine if "mr. mom is sexist, then then will dish B#tch do? sammish please! you gotta make your kids one anyway! XD Back to the deck on a more serious note: I tried my slump lock deck. it's not BAD but I can see why it's an "x line deck", that said I'm liking the princesses, but I just wish there was a plant token generator that was LV 4. dandy would be ideal....but yeah. |
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Feb 17, 2014 12:32:32 GMT -6
Hey just because I raise my children for a living does not mean I am "mr.mom". That is sexist, and I thought you were better than that. fine if "mr. mom is sexist, then then will dish B#tch do? sammish please! you gotta make your kids one anyway! XD Back to the deck on a more serious note: I tried my slump lock deck. it's not BAD but I can see why it's an "x line deck", that said I'm liking the princesses, but I just wish there was a plant token generator that was LV 4. dandy would be ideal....but yeah. Well, the problem that springs to mind, your build has more OPTIONS. But it's SLOWER. And this decks needs to slump quickly or you're kinda screwed. |
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Feb 17, 2014 16:45:29 GMT -6
fine if "mr. mom is sexist, then then will dish B#tch do? sammish please! you gotta make your kids one anyway! XD Back to the deck on a more serious note: I tried my slump lock deck. it's not BAD but I can see why it's an "x line deck", that said I'm liking the princesses, but I just wish there was a plant token generator that was LV 4. dandy would be ideal....but yeah. Well, the problem that springs to mind, your build has more OPTIONS. But it's SLOWER. And this decks needs to slump quickly or you're kinda screwed. I was facing a deck fulla hand traps and fake sets! thats hardly a fair observation, even if it's true. |
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Feb 17, 2014 17:56:29 GMT -6
Well, the problem that springs to mind, your build has more OPTIONS. But it's SLOWER. And this decks needs to slump quickly or you're kinda screwed. I was facing a deck fulla hand traps and fake sets! thats hardly a fair observation, even if it's true. Two hand traps in the entire deck isn't "Fulla hand traps" |
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Feb 17, 2014 20:10:21 GMT -6
I was facing a deck fulla hand traps and fake sets! thats hardly a fair observation, even if it's true. Two hand traps in the entire deck isn't "Fulla hand traps" artifacts set into s/t zone and kind of "surprise" the opponent, it's not an actual hand trap but it is a "trap" (not an actual trap card) that did come from the hand. |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Feb 18, 2014 13:07:16 GMT -6
That is semantics right there. And no sandwich for you, although I did just make grilled cheese for my boys.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Feb 18, 2014 19:51:27 GMT -6
That is semantics right there. And no sandwich for you, although I did just make grilled cheese for my boys. He argues samantics, then tries to tell me 2 pieces of bread with cheese core is not a sandwich......*shakes head* |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Feb 20, 2014 12:06:49 GMT -6
No I said no sandwich for you, even though I made them for my kids. You can make your own damn sammich.
|
|
