|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 9, 2013 21:42:55 GMT -6
Technically finding room for traps does make it a space issue if I'm not mistaken.
|
|
|
|
Post by g1nz0 on Nov 10, 2013 9:04:07 GMT -6
Semantics.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 10, 2013 17:17:48 GMT -6
But true none the less.
|
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Nov 10, 2013 22:09:01 GMT -6
It's not a question of space, or the quality of the card; at least from my experience. I have been running it at 2 for the last version I ran. Don't know his reasoning, but mine was due to the culture change Dragons have taken. And since that is currently the best deck, you need to adapt accordingly. Not only have Dragon decks started to run more Traps, but they are more "real" Traps to offer the deck more dynamic. And this is why I dropped Star Hall to two; to help build in a more comprehensive Trap line-up to compete in the same style of game. My reasoning was rather similar, actually. Still playing around with the trap lineup. |
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Nov 13, 2013 14:29:12 GMT -6
Bumping this up.
|
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Nov 25, 2013 13:33:46 GMT -6
Bumping this up. Can't really think of anything I can do to improve the deck other than making room for Armored Kappa.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 25, 2013 13:52:21 GMT -6
A deck that you can't improve on sounds like a good thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Nov 25, 2013 14:09:31 GMT -6
A deck that you can't improve on sounds like a good thing. Not really. I'm tired of using Prophecy. Don't get me wrong, it's a good deck, and it is fun to play (to an extent), but every game is a grind out game which often leads to a lot of end of match procedure scenarios. I'm just biding my time until we get the new LS support. |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 25, 2013 14:29:47 GMT -6
Then you should focus more on your fun decks right now. Its what I do when normal stuff gets annoying/boring.
|
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Nov 25, 2013 14:34:16 GMT -6
Then you should focus more on your fun decks right now. Its what I do when normal stuff gets annoying/boring. Building Ghostrick for that reason. Between that deck, and the new LS Support (provided it is in the next set), I'll probably be dropping somewhere between $100-$300 on Legacy of the Valiant. |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 25, 2013 14:36:22 GMT -6
Nice. It will probably cost me along the same as Tachyon did. Just short of $500 there, still never pulled Dracossack. I had to trade for one and still buy another.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 26, 2013 1:31:45 GMT -6
I get why it's there, but is eternity REALLY that useful?
|
|
|
|
Post by ライトロード on Nov 26, 2013 9:51:42 GMT -6
I get why it's there, but is eternity REALLY that useful? Yes. It toolboxes fodder used for Fate. The only reason there isn't 2 copies of it is that I don't like opening with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 26, 2013 11:35:29 GMT -6
Eternity can be a Fate that was used for another Fate. Just brings on a threat of another to clear something big.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 26, 2013 23:44:13 GMT -6
Eternity can be a Fate that was used for another Fate. Just brings on a threat of another to clear something big. I suppose so, I dunno I've just never really been fond of eternity, or rather it seemed lack luster when I tried it. |
|
