|
|
Post by thursday on Nov 11, 2013 20:55:16 GMT -6
Oh, sorry. It was at first because I thought I didn't have the space, but then I realized I only had 32 cards so I bumped it up to 40. I should've clarified.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 12, 2013 9:49:40 GMT -6
Did you try it without the Tigers before switching them in?
|
|
|
|
Post by thursday on Nov 12, 2013 23:14:39 GMT -6
Yes.
I found out that Onslaught is great when I get it off. the Fire Fist stuff makes this deck a lot of fun. My main problem is that there's so many cards that people use that really throw my combos off. One or two cards can ruin my entire flow and it's hard to recuperate, especially with me being really aggressive when I shouldn't be. I haven't played much in over a year so I still need to learn the ins and outs of a lot of decks before being so aggressive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 13, 2013 14:16:19 GMT -6
It took me forever to learn conservative play, I've always like aggressive decks. Before I learned my lesson I was playing things like Demise OTK and Hopeless Dragon. Disaster Dragon evolved out of the latter and helped me learn not to go full bore every game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 26, 2013 2:06:48 GMT -6
It took me forever to learn conservative play, I've always like aggressive decks. Before I learned my lesson I was playing things like Demise OTK and Hopeless Dragon. Disaster Dragon evolved out of the latter and helped me learn not to go full bore every game. I'm the same. I learned to play using the old V-Z fusions(then just xy and z) and that deck was a "go balls deep or die" game deck, so when I picked up golem stall I had a lot of learning to do. Now I wanna go work on stall decks and figure out how to slow roll people with some sorta pacman-ghostrick hybrid... |
|
