|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 12, 2013 9:39:58 GMT -6
Shapesister looks like it would be the easiest cut.
|
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Nov 13, 2013 9:40:06 GMT -6
EDIT:
-2 Shapesister
+2 Dimensional Prison
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 13, 2013 14:18:23 GMT -6
Take it you're gonna stick with the 2 lonely TGU. Its all good if you do, I know its a preference thing with them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Drillwarrior on Nov 13, 2013 17:17:00 GMT -6
Yeah, I find them more consistent at 2. And moreso since I want them in the graveyard to fuel dragons. Another LV3 doesn't really benefit the deck much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 13, 2013 18:57:59 GMT -6
I really can't wait til I get this Meliae idea out of my head and can move onto something using those 2 baby chaos bastards.
|
|
|
|
Post by g1nz0 on Nov 15, 2013 12:36:26 GMT -6
Yeah, I find them more consistent at 2. And moreso since I want them in the graveyard to fuel dragons. Another LV3 doesn't really benefit the deck much. Yeah, once TGU went to two and Sangan left, I see no point in muddying the water when the pair by themselves act as a decent one card Rank 3 option. |
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 26, 2013 2:13:30 GMT -6
Any way you could find room for a crimson blader?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 26, 2013 12:29:12 GMT -6
Potentially over 1 of the Scrap Dragon?
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 27, 2013 0:13:00 GMT -6
Potentially over 1 of the Scrap Dragon? I wanted to say that, but damn it, it just looks cool to main 3 scra dra in a deck that can and will drop 'em. |
|
|
|
Post by Ursiel on Nov 27, 2013 13:34:51 GMT -6
Cool, maybe. Necessary, no.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoh Komori on Nov 27, 2013 13:59:13 GMT -6
Cool, maybe. Necessary, no. True. I guess the 3rd scrap should be swapped. |
|
