|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 19, 2014 12:48:04 GMT -6
IMO I can see Konami pushing Artifacts by making a tin for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by ragda on Apr 19, 2014 18:18:59 GMT -6
Not until the second wave I would guess, IF they consider that. If there'll be more Artifacts in future sets, then it wouldn't necessarily be worth it right now to do tins at this point. Best wait until it's all out before you do tins for them. Hence the FF tin, for example, is after all the main support has already been out for a while.
|
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 20, 2014 13:11:25 GMT -6
that is what I am figuring for a second wave of tins.
|
|
|
|
Post by troza on Apr 20, 2014 16:10:48 GMT -6
Well... I don't know... I will want to see this first wave first before trying to guess what will happen in the second tin.
They say that they will focus on Fire Fists and Bujins... maybe they'll do that before killing the deck... so, wave 2 might be also featuring some deck that will be ready to be killed.
|
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 21, 2014 16:18:45 GMT -6
Konami doesn't use the list to kill decks anymore, they use it to tweek the game.
They should still kill certain decks. Helps the game move forward.
|
|
|
|
Post by elvisbeck on Apr 21, 2014 20:20:36 GMT -6
Konami doesn't use the list to kill decks anymore, they use it to tweek the game. They should still kill certain decks. Helps the game move forward. what decks should Konami kill? |
|
|
|
Post by ragda on Apr 21, 2014 22:51:12 GMT -6
Technically, they did kill Dragon Rulers, and more recently, they "killed" Jackpot 7 before it even became a TCG thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by elvisbeck on Apr 22, 2014 6:20:38 GMT -6
Technically, they did kill Dragon Rulers, and more recently, they "killed" Jackpot 7 before it even became a TCG thing. True, since the big Dragon Rulers are limited. |
|
|
|
Post by troza on Apr 22, 2014 8:10:28 GMT -6
But we also have to admit that they tried to do little modifications before finding that it wasn't enough
|
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 22, 2014 8:33:23 GMT -6
Technically, they did kill Dragon Rulers, and more recently, they "killed" Jackpot 7 before it even became a TCG thing. It took 2 lists kill the D.Rulers decks. The only reason why they hit Jackpot 7 was because of the damn OCG players. They can't let us have anything nice. |
|
|
|
Post by troza on Apr 22, 2014 8:39:03 GMT -6
Would that be nice? I don't think so...  |
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 22, 2014 8:44:24 GMT -6
Would that be nice? I don't think so...  I would have like to see a TCG spin being put on that deck, before it got hammered to oblivion. |
|
|
|
Post by troza on Apr 22, 2014 9:04:32 GMT -6
... that would mean some boring duels... mainly in DN when you have to do everything manually and it takes time...
|
|
|
|
Post by bystander on Apr 22, 2014 13:32:49 GMT -6
... that would mean some boring duels... mainly in DN when you have to do everything manually and it takes time... Not going to argue boring duels. |
|
|
|
Post by troza on Apr 22, 2014 14:34:37 GMT -6
I didn't ask to. I was just sharing my opinion. But hey... at least it would make samurais a deck again |
|
.png)
